http://www.wiinintendo.net/2009/03/10/no-wii-motionplus-in-the-conduit/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:30:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.wiinintendo.net/2009/03/10/no-wii-motionplus-in-the-conduit/comment-page-1/#comment-472860 hattrick Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:52:09 +0000 http://www.wiinintendo.net/2009/03/10/no-wii-motionplus-in-the-conduit/#comment-472860 I think it's silly how people still think it is supposed to have WMP. They've been saying they decided not to include it for quite some time. They felt it would feel "tacked on" instead of well implemented. I've always interpreted the "this version" talk as they will try to incorporate it in the sequel. I think it’s silly how people still think it is supposed to have WMP. They’ve been saying they decided not to include it for quite some time. They felt it would feel “tacked on” instead of well implemented. I’ve always interpreted the “this version” talk as they will try to incorporate it in the sequel.

]]> http://www.wiinintendo.net/2009/03/10/no-wii-motionplus-in-the-conduit/comment-page-1/#comment-472263 drew Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:12:53 +0000 http://www.wiinintendo.net/2009/03/10/no-wii-motionplus-in-the-conduit/#comment-472263 Actually, it does help pointer tracking, indirectly. If the pointer leaves the screen, the motion plus can continue to determine the pointer's location based on movement of the remote alone. This eliminates the need for those "point wii remote at screen" messages, like in TP for example. Actually, it does help pointer tracking, indirectly. If the pointer leaves the screen, the motion plus can continue to determine the pointer’s location based on movement of the remote alone. This eliminates the need for those “point wii remote at screen” messages, like in TP for example.

]]>