Comments on: EA: Boom Blox, “the physics are better than any game”

By: User

User — Fri, 09 May 2008 09:11:35 +0000

@Roth Havok was not developed by Valve.

By: SirVenom

SirVenom — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:42:20 +0000

@Bordios07
And so you are right. I can fix it in this article, but frankly I have no idea (or no access to, not sure) how to edit the polls.

By: Bordios07

Bordios07 — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:49:04 +0000

I really enjoy your site but you guys need to do a bit more editing. Your spelling is mistaken fairly often. I’m not english major, but I believe you meant to say “the physics are better THAN any game.” the same mistake was made on the weekly poll. “more THAN i can even read.” I only make this spelling critique because they are silly mistakes that occur often and need to be corrected for this site to be taken very serious; and I want it to be. You guys work very hard, keep up the good work!

By: Roth

Roth — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:44:55 +0000

Even better than Crysis’ physics?
YouTube code: /watch?v=VaHS-y_mapQ

Boom Blox uses the Havok physics engine (developed by Valve), the same one in de Blob, Alone in the Dark, Halo Wars, Mercenaries 2, and even Brawl.

But I believe the physics in Crysis is the still the best we’ve seen.

// Roth