<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wii On the Tail of 360.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirVenom</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-83854</link>
		<dc:creator>SirVenom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-83854</guid>
		<description>I believe that they are fairly accurate.

What would you call a real statistic?

Besides, when I said numbers talk I was referring to the sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that they are fairly accurate.</p>
<p>What would you call a real statistic?</p>
<p>Besides, when I said numbers talk I was referring to the sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirVenom</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-828383</link>
		<dc:creator>SirVenom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-828383</guid>
		<description>I believe that they are fairly accurate.

What would you call a real statistic?

Besides, when I said numbers talk I was referring to the sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that they are fairly accurate.</p>
<p>What would you call a real statistic?</p>
<p>Besides, when I said numbers talk I was referring to the sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Air</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-83842</link>
		<dc:creator>Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-83842</guid>
		<description>The numbers do talk if they&#039;re real statistics, not ones you chopped up from the world population. =/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers do talk if they&#8217;re real statistics, not ones you chopped up from the world population. =/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Air</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-828382</link>
		<dc:creator>Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-828382</guid>
		<description>The numbers do talk if they&#039;re real statistics, not ones you chopped up from the world population. =/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers do talk if they&#8217;re real statistics, not ones you chopped up from the world population. =/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-83646</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-83646</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;m not only amazed with Nintendo&#039;s success this round but am pleased that they&#039;ve opened the flood gates to a new expanded market.  I just find it too cool that families can finally play these things together and people are no longer anti-social or uber-nerds for enjoying video games. Also as I&#039;ve gotten older, I&#039;ve found the endless value of multi-player titles and of course the system caters primarily to that demo.  
Just like numbers are relative, so is opinion and success. As my comments speaking volumes to one they also say nothing to another. On a completely economic stance, Nintendo is probably doing better than ever, becoming one of the greatest industries to come out of Japan. Sony and Microsoft can just about do nothing to shake that.  Gamers should be pleased to see that Nintendo, a company exclusively concerned with gaming is still kicking and conquering giants of tech whose game sales account for blips on their maps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;m not only amazed with Nintendo&#8217;s success this round but am pleased that they&#8217;ve opened the flood gates to a new expanded market.  I just find it too cool that families can finally play these things together and people are no longer anti-social or uber-nerds for enjoying video games. Also as I&#8217;ve gotten older, I&#8217;ve found the endless value of multi-player titles and of course the system caters primarily to that demo.<br />
Just like numbers are relative, so is opinion and success. As my comments speaking volumes to one they also say nothing to another. On a completely economic stance, Nintendo is probably doing better than ever, becoming one of the greatest industries to come out of Japan. Sony and Microsoft can just about do nothing to shake that.  Gamers should be pleased to see that Nintendo, a company exclusively concerned with gaming is still kicking and conquering giants of tech whose game sales account for blips on their maps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-828381</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-828381</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;m not only amazed with Nintendo&#039;s success this round but am pleased that they&#039;ve opened the flood gates to a new expanded market.  I just find it too cool that families can finally play these things together and people are no longer anti-social or uber-nerds for enjoying video games. Also as I&#039;ve gotten older, I&#039;ve found the endless value of multi-player titles and of course the system caters primarily to that demo.  
Just like numbers are relative, so is opinion and success. As my comments speaking volumes to one they also say nothing to another. On a completely economic stance, Nintendo is probably doing better than ever, becoming one of the greatest industries to come out of Japan. Sony and Microsoft can just about do nothing to shake that.  Gamers should be pleased to see that Nintendo, a company exclusively concerned with gaming is still kicking and conquering giants of tech whose game sales account for blips on their maps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;m not only amazed with Nintendo&#8217;s success this round but am pleased that they&#8217;ve opened the flood gates to a new expanded market.  I just find it too cool that families can finally play these things together and people are no longer anti-social or uber-nerds for enjoying video games. Also as I&#8217;ve gotten older, I&#8217;ve found the endless value of multi-player titles and of course the system caters primarily to that demo.<br />
Just like numbers are relative, so is opinion and success. As my comments speaking volumes to one they also say nothing to another. On a completely economic stance, Nintendo is probably doing better than ever, becoming one of the greatest industries to come out of Japan. Sony and Microsoft can just about do nothing to shake that.  Gamers should be pleased to see that Nintendo, a company exclusively concerned with gaming is still kicking and conquering giants of tech whose game sales account for blips on their maps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirVenom</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-83629</link>
		<dc:creator>SirVenom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-83629</guid>
		<description>I see what you are saying, but I just believe numbers talk. But, each to his own, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you are saying, but I just believe numbers talk. But, each to his own, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirVenom</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-828380</link>
		<dc:creator>SirVenom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-828380</guid>
		<description>I see what you are saying, but I just believe numbers talk. But, each to his own, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you are saying, but I just believe numbers talk. But, each to his own, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HandKannon</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-83596</link>
		<dc:creator>HandKannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-83596</guid>
		<description>Those are very detailed statistics.  But I&#039;m not saying they HAVE to double the 360&#039;s sales.  The Wii&#039;s doing just fine accelerating at its speed.  And hell, it probably will reach over 40 million hardware sales within 6-10 years.  I mean, I once heard a statistic that there were over 100 million PS2 sales (although there is some debate regarding multiple purchases, and the fact that they re-released and what-not).

This article is slightly misleading, though.  The author implies that because the Wii has almost caught up to the 360 means that it MUST have higher quality games.  I tend to disagree with that.  Sales doesn&#039;t measure equity or quality.

I don&#039;t really want to debate about that though, as it is somewhat subjective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are very detailed statistics.  But I&#8217;m not saying they HAVE to double the 360&#8242;s sales.  The Wii&#8217;s doing just fine accelerating at its speed.  And hell, it probably will reach over 40 million hardware sales within 6-10 years.  I mean, I once heard a statistic that there were over 100 million PS2 sales (although there is some debate regarding multiple purchases, and the fact that they re-released and what-not).</p>
<p>This article is slightly misleading, though.  The author implies that because the Wii has almost caught up to the 360 means that it MUST have higher quality games.  I tend to disagree with that.  Sales doesn&#8217;t measure equity or quality.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really want to debate about that though, as it is somewhat subjective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HandKannon</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-828379</link>
		<dc:creator>HandKannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-828379</guid>
		<description>Those are very detailed statistics.  But I&#039;m not saying they HAVE to double the 360&#039;s sales.  The Wii&#039;s doing just fine accelerating at its speed.  And hell, it probably will reach over 40 million hardware sales within 6-10 years.  I mean, I once heard a statistic that there were over 100 million PS2 sales (although there is some debate regarding multiple purchases, and the fact that they re-released and what-not).

This article is slightly misleading, though.  The author implies that because the Wii has almost caught up to the 360 means that it MUST have higher quality games.  I tend to disagree with that.  Sales doesn&#039;t measure equity or quality.

I don&#039;t really want to debate about that though, as it is somewhat subjective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are very detailed statistics.  But I&#8217;m not saying they HAVE to double the 360&#8242;s sales.  The Wii&#8217;s doing just fine accelerating at its speed.  And hell, it probably will reach over 40 million hardware sales within 6-10 years.  I mean, I once heard a statistic that there were over 100 million PS2 sales (although there is some debate regarding multiple purchases, and the fact that they re-released and what-not).</p>
<p>This article is slightly misleading, though.  The author implies that because the Wii has almost caught up to the 360 means that it MUST have higher quality games.  I tend to disagree with that.  Sales doesn&#8217;t measure equity or quality.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really want to debate about that though, as it is somewhat subjective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirVenom</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-83540</link>
		<dc:creator>SirVenom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-83540</guid>
		<description>HandKannon;
The world population is near 6,602,224,175
They can be divided into a few subcatergories....

0-14 years: 27.4% (male 931,551,498/female 875,646,416) 
15-64 years: 65.1% (male 2,174,605,518/female 2,124,494,703) 
65 years and over: 7.5% (male 217,451,123/female 278,474,917) (2007 est.) 

Literacy affects the ability to play games...

Literacy: definition: age 15 and over can read and write 
total population: 82% 
male: 87% 
female: 77% 
note: over two-thirds of the world&#039;s 785 million illiterate adults are found in only eight countries (India, China, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Egypt); of all the illiterate adults in the world, two-thirds are women; extremely low literacy rates are concentrated in three regions, South and West Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Arab states, where around one-third of the men and half of all women are illiterate (2005 est.)  

Ok, so we cut down that percentage...

Approximately....

0-14 years: (male 931,551,498/female 875,646,416) 
15-64 years: (male 1,891,906,800/female 1,635,860,921) 

I didn&#039;t touch the 0-14 catergory yet...

So, we know for a fact that there are NOT billions of gamers in the world... there are many countries that don&#039;t even have gaming consoles. Let us cut that measure down to 1/10

0-14 years: (male 93,155,149/female 87,564,641) 
15-64 years: (male 189,190,680/female 163,586,092)

Ok, we still have hundreds of millions of people here...

Females are less likely to play games. Let us imagine that only 1/20 of all females (15-20)in that figure are likely to play a game.

Let us also cut the 0-14 range down to 1/20 on account of people too young to play.

Let us cut males (15-64) down to 1/10

0-14 years: (male 4,657,757/female 4,378,232) 
15-64 years: (male 18,919,068/female 8,179,304)

Starting to look more realistic. Let us add this figure all into one ball...

We have 36,134,361 potential gamers here.

Now, for Nintendo to DOUBLE 360&#039;s sales, which would continue to grow along with the Wii (though slower), they would eventually have to get near 40,000,000 sales.

Sure, reaching into the non-gamer catergory makes this possible, but not reaching that goal means nothing. They are not required to win people over that are not gamers in the first place.

With that, I take my leave.

---SirVenom---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HandKannon;<br />
The world population is near 6,602,224,175<br />
They can be divided into a few subcatergories&#8230;.</p>
<p>0-14 years: 27.4% (male 931,551,498/female 875,646,416)<br />
15-64 years: 65.1% (male 2,174,605,518/female 2,124,494,703)<br />
65 years and over: 7.5% (male 217,451,123/female 278,474,917) (2007 est.) </p>
<p>Literacy affects the ability to play games&#8230;</p>
<p>Literacy: definition: age 15 and over can read and write<br />
total population: 82%<br />
male: 87%<br />
female: 77%<br />
note: over two-thirds of the world&#8217;s 785 million illiterate adults are found in only eight countries (India, China, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Egypt); of all the illiterate adults in the world, two-thirds are women; extremely low literacy rates are concentrated in three regions, South and West Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Arab states, where around one-third of the men and half of all women are illiterate (2005 est.)  </p>
<p>Ok, so we cut down that percentage&#8230;</p>
<p>Approximately&#8230;.</p>
<p>0-14 years: (male 931,551,498/female 875,646,416)<br />
15-64 years: (male 1,891,906,800/female 1,635,860,921) </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t touch the 0-14 catergory yet&#8230;</p>
<p>So, we know for a fact that there are NOT billions of gamers in the world&#8230; there are many countries that don&#8217;t even have gaming consoles. Let us cut that measure down to 1/10</p>
<p>0-14 years: (male 93,155,149/female 87,564,641)<br />
15-64 years: (male 189,190,680/female 163,586,092)</p>
<p>Ok, we still have hundreds of millions of people here&#8230;</p>
<p>Females are less likely to play games. Let us imagine that only 1/20 of all females (15-20)in that figure are likely to play a game.</p>
<p>Let us also cut the 0-14 range down to 1/20 on account of people too young to play.</p>
<p>Let us cut males (15-64) down to 1/10</p>
<p>0-14 years: (male 4,657,757/female 4,378,232)<br />
15-64 years: (male 18,919,068/female 8,179,304)</p>
<p>Starting to look more realistic. Let us add this figure all into one ball&#8230;</p>
<p>We have 36,134,361 potential gamers here.</p>
<p>Now, for Nintendo to DOUBLE 360&#8242;s sales, which would continue to grow along with the Wii (though slower), they would eventually have to get near 40,000,000 sales.</p>
<p>Sure, reaching into the non-gamer catergory makes this possible, but not reaching that goal means nothing. They are not required to win people over that are not gamers in the first place.</p>
<p>With that, I take my leave.</p>
<p>&#8212;SirVenom&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirVenom</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-828378</link>
		<dc:creator>SirVenom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-828378</guid>
		<description>HandKannon;
The world population is near 6,602,224,175
They can be divided into a few subcatergories....

0-14 years: 27.4% (male 931,551,498/female 875,646,416) 
15-64 years: 65.1% (male 2,174,605,518/female 2,124,494,703) 
65 years and over: 7.5% (male 217,451,123/female 278,474,917) (2007 est.) 

Literacy affects the ability to play games...

Literacy: definition: age 15 and over can read and write 
total population: 82% 
male: 87% 
female: 77% 
note: over two-thirds of the world&#039;s 785 million illiterate adults are found in only eight countries (India, China, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Egypt); of all the illiterate adults in the world, two-thirds are women; extremely low literacy rates are concentrated in three regions, South and West Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Arab states, where around one-third of the men and half of all women are illiterate (2005 est.)  

Ok, so we cut down that percentage...

Approximately....

0-14 years: (male 931,551,498/female 875,646,416) 
15-64 years: (male 1,891,906,800/female 1,635,860,921) 

I didn&#039;t touch the 0-14 catergory yet...

So, we know for a fact that there are NOT billions of gamers in the world... there are many countries that don&#039;t even have gaming consoles. Let us cut that measure down to 1/10

0-14 years: (male 93,155,149/female 87,564,641) 
15-64 years: (male 189,190,680/female 163,586,092)

Ok, we still have hundreds of millions of people here...

Females are less likely to play games. Let us imagine that only 1/20 of all females (15-20)in that figure are likely to play a game.

Let us also cut the 0-14 range down to 1/20 on account of people too young to play.

Let us cut males (15-64) down to 1/10

0-14 years: (male 4,657,757/female 4,378,232) 
15-64 years: (male 18,919,068/female 8,179,304)

Starting to look more realistic. Let us add this figure all into one ball...

We have 36,134,361 potential gamers here.

Now, for Nintendo to DOUBLE 360&#039;s sales, which would continue to grow along with the Wii (though slower), they would eventually have to get near 40,000,000 sales.

Sure, reaching into the non-gamer catergory makes this possible, but not reaching that goal means nothing. They are not required to win people over that are not gamers in the first place.

With that, I take my leave.

---SirVenom---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HandKannon;<br />
The world population is near 6,602,224,175<br />
They can be divided into a few subcatergories&#8230;.</p>
<p>0-14 years: 27.4% (male 931,551,498/female 875,646,416)<br />
15-64 years: 65.1% (male 2,174,605,518/female 2,124,494,703)<br />
65 years and over: 7.5% (male 217,451,123/female 278,474,917) (2007 est.) </p>
<p>Literacy affects the ability to play games&#8230;</p>
<p>Literacy: definition: age 15 and over can read and write<br />
total population: 82%<br />
male: 87%<br />
female: 77%<br />
note: over two-thirds of the world&#8217;s 785 million illiterate adults are found in only eight countries (India, China, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Egypt); of all the illiterate adults in the world, two-thirds are women; extremely low literacy rates are concentrated in three regions, South and West Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Arab states, where around one-third of the men and half of all women are illiterate (2005 est.)  </p>
<p>Ok, so we cut down that percentage&#8230;</p>
<p>Approximately&#8230;.</p>
<p>0-14 years: (male 931,551,498/female 875,646,416)<br />
15-64 years: (male 1,891,906,800/female 1,635,860,921) </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t touch the 0-14 catergory yet&#8230;</p>
<p>So, we know for a fact that there are NOT billions of gamers in the world&#8230; there are many countries that don&#8217;t even have gaming consoles. Let us cut that measure down to 1/10</p>
<p>0-14 years: (male 93,155,149/female 87,564,641)<br />
15-64 years: (male 189,190,680/female 163,586,092)</p>
<p>Ok, we still have hundreds of millions of people here&#8230;</p>
<p>Females are less likely to play games. Let us imagine that only 1/20 of all females (15-20)in that figure are likely to play a game.</p>
<p>Let us also cut the 0-14 range down to 1/20 on account of people too young to play.</p>
<p>Let us cut males (15-64) down to 1/10</p>
<p>0-14 years: (male 4,657,757/female 4,378,232)<br />
15-64 years: (male 18,919,068/female 8,179,304)</p>
<p>Starting to look more realistic. Let us add this figure all into one ball&#8230;</p>
<p>We have 36,134,361 potential gamers here.</p>
<p>Now, for Nintendo to DOUBLE 360&#8242;s sales, which would continue to grow along with the Wii (though slower), they would eventually have to get near 40,000,000 sales.</p>
<p>Sure, reaching into the non-gamer catergory makes this possible, but not reaching that goal means nothing. They are not required to win people over that are not gamers in the first place.</p>
<p>With that, I take my leave.</p>
<p>&#8212;SirVenom&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HandKannon</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-83434</link>
		<dc:creator>HandKannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-83434</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not doubting Nintendo&#039;s success.  At all.  I&#039;m just saying that the news of the Wii catching up to the Xbox 360 doesn&#039;t impress me.  If they had double the sales, yeah, then I would be impressed.  Actually, if they had 1.5 times as many sales (which I honestly believe they might be able to achieve it within another year) I would be impressed.  I just through a number out there.

The 360 isn&#039;t all about graphics, by the way.  It has some of the highest rated games of this generation...  And most of them aren&#039;t sequels, and (even better) there&#039;s still plenty to come.

I own a Wii (which is why I frequent this site) and I can&#039;t wait for it&#039;s good games to come out.  But I mean so far, most of the games aren&#039;t critically appraised or appeasing to me personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not doubting Nintendo&#8217;s success.  At all.  I&#8217;m just saying that the news of the Wii catching up to the Xbox 360 doesn&#8217;t impress me.  If they had double the sales, yeah, then I would be impressed.  Actually, if they had 1.5 times as many sales (which I honestly believe they might be able to achieve it within another year) I would be impressed.  I just through a number out there.</p>
<p>The 360 isn&#8217;t all about graphics, by the way.  It has some of the highest rated games of this generation&#8230;  And most of them aren&#8217;t sequels, and (even better) there&#8217;s still plenty to come.</p>
<p>I own a Wii (which is why I frequent this site) and I can&#8217;t wait for it&#8217;s good games to come out.  But I mean so far, most of the games aren&#8217;t critically appraised or appeasing to me personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HandKannon</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-828377</link>
		<dc:creator>HandKannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-828377</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not doubting Nintendo&#039;s success.  At all.  I&#039;m just saying that the news of the Wii catching up to the Xbox 360 doesn&#039;t impress me.  If they had double the sales, yeah, then I would be impressed.  Actually, if they had 1.5 times as many sales (which I honestly believe they might be able to achieve it within another year) I would be impressed.  I just through a number out there.

The 360 isn&#039;t all about graphics, by the way.  It has some of the highest rated games of this generation...  And most of them aren&#039;t sequels, and (even better) there&#039;s still plenty to come.

I own a Wii (which is why I frequent this site) and I can&#039;t wait for it&#039;s good games to come out.  But I mean so far, most of the games aren&#039;t critically appraised or appeasing to me personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not doubting Nintendo&#8217;s success.  At all.  I&#8217;m just saying that the news of the Wii catching up to the Xbox 360 doesn&#8217;t impress me.  If they had double the sales, yeah, then I would be impressed.  Actually, if they had 1.5 times as many sales (which I honestly believe they might be able to achieve it within another year) I would be impressed.  I just through a number out there.</p>
<p>The 360 isn&#8217;t all about graphics, by the way.  It has some of the highest rated games of this generation&#8230;  And most of them aren&#8217;t sequels, and (even better) there&#8217;s still plenty to come.</p>
<p>I own a Wii (which is why I frequent this site) and I can&#8217;t wait for it&#8217;s good games to come out.  But I mean so far, most of the games aren&#8217;t critically appraised or appeasing to me personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/comment-page-1/#comment-83415</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 05:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiinintendo.net/2007/08/14/wii-on-the-tail-of-360/#comment-83415</guid>
		<description>The 360 being priced double doesn&#039;t change a thing about Nintendo&#039;s success.

If you want to look at it like that, then the 360&#039;s been out for a year longer than the Wii, and the Wii has been out for less than a year.

If they were sold simultaneously, my bet would be that the Wii&#039;d have sold more than 2x as many consoles as the 360.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 360 being priced double doesn&#8217;t change a thing about Nintendo&#8217;s success.</p>
<p>If you want to look at it like that, then the 360&#8242;s been out for a year longer than the Wii, and the Wii has been out for less than a year.</p>
<p>If they were sold simultaneously, my bet would be that the Wii&#8217;d have sold more than 2x as many consoles as the 360.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

